|
back to Organic Consumers Assn.
Stop Food Irradiation page
USDA To Shift Some Meat Testing
[Translation: Deregulation continues: USDA to prohibit government inspectors
from inspecting ready-to-eat meat products if the company has its own testing program.]
November 2, 2000
By PHILIP BRASHER, AP Farm Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - Meat processors that make hot dogs and other precooked products are being encouraged by the government
to do their own testing for harmful bacteria rather than rely on federal inspectors to do the monitoring.
Under a policy announced Thursday, the Agriculture Department said it will stop doing routine microbiological tests
in plants that have adequate sampling programs of their own. USDA officials said they want to target their testing
on processors, usually smaller plants, that don't have adequate monitoring programs.
The change will result in more testing being done industrywide, said Thomas Billy, administrator of USDA's Food
Safety and Inspection Service.
``By following a strategy that encourages industry to test, there will be much more product testing overall ...
than FSIS could ever do on its own,'' he said.
The tests, which look for pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes and salmonella, are designed to catch contamination
in plants or flaws in their sanitation systems.
``This is a step forward, because you're going to end up with substantially more tests,'' said Carol Tucker Foreman,
director of the Consumer Federation of America's Food Policy Institute.
Processors have a powerful incentive to do the testing themselves: When federal inspectors conduct the tests, all
the meat in the lots being sampled is typically kept out of distribution until the results come back, in case there
is a positive test result, industry officials said.
If the companies are doing the routine testing themselves, there would be no need to hold the product for test
results, but plants would still be expected to issue a recall for products in which harmful bacteria are found,
USDA officials said.
The new testing policy will result in safer food, said Lloyd Hontz, director of food inspection issues for the
National Food Processors Association, a trade group.
``Consumers are better protected with a policy like this which encourages the industry to do its own testing,''
he said. ``They can really look for spots or points or places in their production operations that might be harboring
pathogens and find them and get rid of them.''
Plants that already do some pathogen testing may be required to do it more frequently if they want to be exempt
from routine USDA monitoring, Hontz said.
Processors that start their own testing program will have just as many USDA inspectors on site as they do now,
but they will have more time for other jobs, such as checking plant records to verify that sanitation procedures
are being followed, agency officials said.
The new policy is part of a general strategy by the Clinton administration to require the meat industry to take
more responsibility for improving plant sanitation and testing for pathogens. While some critics say that USDA
has gone too far, consumer advocacy groups have generally supported the agency.
[Editor's note: Not true. He refers to CSPI and STOP, and industry-funded 'consumer' front
groups. Public Citizen and many grassroots-oriented consumer food-safety groups do not support deregulation.]
Ready-to-eat meat products are a major source of Listeria-related illnesses.
Listeria is estimated to kill 500 Americans a year and sicken 2,000 more. It causes flu-like symptoms in most healthy
people, but it can be serious in the young, old or weak. In pregnant women, the bacterium can cause miscarriage
or stillbirth even if the mother feels no symptoms.
|