Organic Consumers Association    News | Campaigns | GE Food | Organics | Food Locator | Events | Irradiation | Globalization | Cloning | rBGH
Mad Cow | Toxic Food | Search | Newsletter | Donate | Volunteer | About | Home | recommend site | email this page


Biotech Companies Continue To Develop Terminator and Traitor Seed

Biotech Companies Continue To
Develop Terminator and Traitor Seed

News Release:
31 January 2002
www.etcgroup.org

Sterile Harvest:

New Crop of Terminator Patents Threatens Food Sovereignty

The World's Largest Agrochemical and Seed Enterprises --Syngenta &
DuPont -- Win Two New Patents on Genetic Seed Sterilization

The ETC group (formerly RAFI) announced today that the biotechnology
industry continues to aggressively pursue the development of genetically
modified seeds that are engineered for sterility. "We have uncovered
two new patents on Terminator technology," said Hope Shand, Research
Director of ETC group. "One patent is held by Dupont (the world's
largest seed corporation) and the other is held by Syngenta (the world's
largest agrochemical corporation)," said Shand.

Terminator has been widely condemned as an immoral technology that
threatens global food security, especially for the 1.4 billion people
who depend on farm-saved seed. If commercialized, the technology will
prevent farmers from saving seed from their harvest for planting the
following season. In 1999, due to widespread public opposition to
Terminator seeds, both Monsanto (soon-to-be-spun-off by Pharmacia) and
AstraZeneca (now Syngenta) publicly vowed not to commercialize genetic
seed sterilization technology.1

"Contrary to what some of these companies have pledged in the past, the
Gene Giants are refining the technology and moving forward to
commercialize Terminator seeds," warns Hope Shand, Research Director of
the ETC group. "Terminator is a real and present danger for global food
security and biodiversity - governments and civil society cannot afford
to let 'suicide seeds' slip beneath their radar," said Shand.

Syngenta, the world's largest agribusiness firm, holds the largest
arsenal of Terminator patents to date.2 In 1999, Zeneca's R&D director
wrote that Terminator was "one piece of technology we did not want to
take forward, and the project was stopped in 1992."3 Why, then, has the
company continued to file for and win Terminator patents since 1992?
(The newest Syngenta patent issued on May 8, 2001. The application date
was March 22, 1997, long after Zeneca claims it stopped the project.)

"Obviously, we can't rely on the goodwill of multinational seed and
agrochemical corporations to safeguard the public from the threat of
Terminator seeds. If these companies are serious about abandoning the
technology, they should surrender their patents to the control of the UN
Food & Agriculture Organization, agreeing not to develop the technology
themselves, nor allow others access to their technologies," advised
Julie Delahanty.

Two New Terminator Patents:

Dupont (Pioneer Hi-Bred International), US Patent 6,297,426, issued
October 2, 2001.

Title: Methods of mediating female fertility in plants.
The patent describes the identification and inactivation of a
native gene critical to female fertility. The gene is cloned, linked to
an inducible promoter and inserted into the plant. The result is a plant
that is functionally female sterile with inducible female fertility.
(Note: Although the patent describes the use of this technology for
facilitating production of hybrid seed, this approach involves chemical
control of female fertility, and its extension to other seed lines. ETC
group considers this a Terminator-type technology.)

Syngenta (Zeneca), US Patent 6,228,643, issued May 8, 2001.

Title: Promoter.
The patent describes a new promoter, isolated fromrapeseed,
and the control of plant traits (including fertility) that can be
inactivated and restored by application of a chemical inducer. In one
embodiment, the seeds will not germinate unless sprayed with a chemical
inducer.

Industry's "Green Gene" Defense of Terminator:
The new Syngenta patent does not describe its technology as a method to
prevent farmers from saving seed, but as an approach to prevent unwanted
gene flow from transgenic varieties. In theory, any seed that goes where
it shouldn't would die without the application of a chemical inducer.
According to the patent:

"A problem addressed by the present invention is the containment of crop
plants within the area of cultivation. Seeds of cultivated crop plants
may be conveyed outside the defined growing area by a number of
routes(by birds or small mammals or simply by being dropped during
post-harvest transport of a seed crop) where they assume the status of
weeds, or they may remain as vounteers in a subsequent crop in later
years...It will be appreciated that the problems of crop non-confinement
mentioned above become more acute where transgenic crops are involved...
Ways to reduce viability of such hybrids would limit the risk of
transgene escape to non-crop species thus avoiding the spreading of
plants with enhanced invasiveness or weediness." -US patent 6,228,643

It is irresponsible and unacceptable to suggest that society must accept
genetic seed sterilization as a method for solving industry's genetic
pollution problem. Food security for poor people must not be sacrificed
to gain commercial acceptance for an unsafe and unproven technology.

The biotech industry is reeling from the most recent debacles involving
GM pollution from transgenic plants. The Mexican Ministry of Environment
confirmed again last week that indigenous farmers' maize varieties in
Oaxaca and Puebla have been contaminated with DNA from genetically
modified (GM) maize. It is illegal to grow GM maize in Mexico precisely
because of the potential threat to the world's primary center of maize
diversity. In Canada, the escape of transgenes from GM canola is a
menace for organic farmers who cannot certify their canola crops as
GM-free. On January 10, 2002 organic farmers in Saskatchewan filed a
class action suit against Aventis and Monsanto.

"It is particularly alarming that the Gene Giants (and some governments)
are promoting Terminator under the guise of biosafety," explains Julie
Delahanty of ETC group. "The industry's primary goal is to gain market
acceptance for seed sterility as a biosafety tool, which will then give
them carte blanche to use it as a monopoly tool for maximizing seed
industry profits," said Delahanty.

Terminator on the Road to Rio+10:
New Terminator patents underscore industry's ongoing investment in the
goal of genetic seed sterilization and the urgent need for governments
to ban these technologies before they are commercialized.

Terminator is on the agenda this week at meetings in New York City,
Porto Alegre and Montreal. ETC group, together with civil society
organizations and governments, will hold briefings on the issue at the
Rio+10 PrepCom in New York, at the World Social Forum in Brazil, and in
Montreal at an informal consultation on the impacts of Terminator on
local communities and Farmers' Rights (held under the auspices of the
Convention on Biological Diversity).

In the months leading up to Rio+10, intergovernmental organizations have
a critical role to play in raising global awareness and recommending
actions to ban the technology.

COP6 - The Sixth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on
Biological Diversity meets in The Hague, 8-26 April 2002. After numerous
studies on genetic trait control technology, COP6 should ban Terminator
as an anti-farmer technology that threatens biodiversity and food
sovereignty.

World Food Summit Five Years Later: When governments meet 10-13 June
2002 in Rome they should re-affirm the findings of FAO's Panel of
Eminent Experts on Ethics, which concluded that Terminator seeds are
unethical, and recommend that member nations ban the technology.

World Summit on Sustainable Development (Rio+10): Heads of State meeting
in South Africa in 26 August- 4 Sept. 2002 will have the opportunity to
call for a ban on Terminator technology as an immoral application of
genetic engineering that threatens biodiversity and food security.

Please go to our web site, www.etcgroup.org, to enter our April Fools'
Day contest. We need your help completing the sentence, "Using GM
Terminator to halt GM seed contamination is like..."

For more information:

Julie Delahanty, ETC group: (613) 262-8519 (cell) julie@etcgroup.org
Hope Shand, ETC group: (919) 960-5223 hope@etcgroup.org Silvia Ribeiro,
ETC group: silvia@etcgroup.org


Notes:
1 Pharmacia, which currently owns 85% of Monsanto, will distribute its
Monsanto stock to shareholders in second half of 2002. 2 See RAFI/ETC
group, "New Terminator Patent Goes to Syngenta," News Release, 12 March
2001. www.etcgroup.org 3 Letter from Dr. D.A. Evans, R&D Director,
Zeneca Agrochemicals, to Prof. Richard Jefferson, CAMBIA, Australia, 24
Feb. 1999.


The Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration, formerly
RAFI, is an international civil society organization headquartered in
Canada. The ETC group (pronounced Etcetera group) is dedicated to the
advancement of cultural and ecological diversity and human rights.
www.etcgroup.org

Thank you for joining our mailing list and for your interest in our
organization.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
To be unsubscribed from the mailing list simply click on the link below

http://www.etcgroup.org/cgi-bin/s.pl?r=1&l=1&e=simon=:organicconsumers.o
rg



 News | Campaigns | GE Food | Organics | Irradiation | Find Organics | Events
Mad Cow | Globalization | Cloning | rBGH | Food Safety | Newsletter | Search
Volunteer | Donate | About | Home | Recommend Site | Email This Page | Site Map

Organic Consumers Association
6101 Cliff Estate Rd, Little Marais, MN 55614
E-mail:Staff · Activist or Media Inquiries: 218-226-4164 · Fax: 218-353-7652
Please support our work. Send a tax-deductible donation to the OCA